Compare hosts / Bluehost vs Hostinger
Bluehost vs Hostinger: uptime compared
Over the last 30 days, Bluehost and Hostinger had the same uptime in our checks (100.00%). Bluehost's website answered faster on average (86 ms against 96 ms).
BluehostHostinger
Right nowUpUp
Uptime, last 30 days100.00%100.00%
Uptime, last 90 days100.00%100.00%
Average response time (30 days)86 ms96 ms
Outages (90 days)00
Days with any issues (90 days)00
Machine-readable status pageNoYes
Bluehost100.00% over 90 days
90 days agoToday
Hostinger100.00% over 90 days
90 days agoToday
How we measure
We check each company's own website every 3 minutes from our server, and read its official status page where it has one. A service counts as down when its site fails twice in a row or its status page reports a major outage. We started tracking 2 days ago, so the 90-day figures cover that period. Your own site's uptime also depends on your plan, server and setup, so treat this as a guide to how reliable each company is overall.